A FAST PULSE SIGNAL DETECTION METHOD BASED ON THE MG-YOLOv11n NETWORK

Authors

  • Peng Zhang (Corresponding Author) Ceyear Technologies Co., Ltd, Qingdao 266555, Shandong, China.
  • LiangHai Sun College of Oceanography and Space Informatics, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China.

Keywords:

Pulse signal detection, MG-YOLOv11n, Multiscale attention mechanism

Abstract

This study presents MG-YOLOv11n, a lightweight adaptation of YOLOv11n for rapid detection of pulse signals in time–frequency representations. To improve discrimination between signals with closely related spectral patterns, the network incorporates a multiscale attention module that emphasizes informative regions and feature channels. Computational demands are reduced by substituting selected conventional convolutions with ghost convolutions and removing low-contribution channels through L1-regularization-guided structured pruning. The resulting network is fine-tuned to recover detection performance after compression. Experimental evaluation indicates that MG-YOLOv11n achieves high detection accuracy while requiring fewer model parameters and less computation, supporting efficient analysis of pulse signals.

References

[1] Li J X, Huang W Q, Jiang Y L. Radar pulse signal detection and time of arrival estimation based on LSTM. Shipboard Electronic Countermeasures, 2025, 48(04): 69-73.

[2] Nuhoglu M A, Alp Y K, Akyon F C. Deep Learning for Radar Signal Detection in Electronic Warfare Systems. 2020 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf20), 2020: 1-6.

[3] Kang Z. Integrated radar pulse signal detection, sorting, and recognition based on U-Net. Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 2023, 38(06): 45-52.

[4] Wu Y Z, Mao Y, Chen X. Research on Radar Signal Recognition Technology Based on Deep Learning. 2020 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronics Technology (ICET), 2020: 630-633.

[5] Han J Y, Guo K Y, Sheng X Q. YOLO Network-Based Extraction of Target Geometry From Time-Frequency Representation. IEEE Access, 2025, 13: 53980-53995.

[6] Sarkar S, Guo D N, Cabric D. RadYOLOLet: Radar Detection and Parameter Estimation Using YOLO and WaveLet. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2025, 11(4): 2340-2355.

[7] Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, et al. You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016: 779-788.

[8] Ali M L, Zhang Z. The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection. Computers, 2024, 13: 336.

[9] Hua Z, Aranganadin K, Yeh C, et al. A Benchmark Review of YOLO Algorithm Developments for Object Detection. IEEE Access, 2025, 13: 123515-123545.

[10] Rahima K, Hussain M. YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17725, 2024.

[11] Woo S, Park J, Lee J Y, et al. CBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module. Computer Vision – ECCV 2018, 2018: 3-19.

[12] Rahman M M, Munir M, Marculescu R. EMCAD: Efficient Multi-scale Convolutional Attention Decoding for Medical Image Segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024: 11769-11779.

[13] Han K, Wang Y, Tian Q, et al. GhostNet: More Features from Cheap Operations. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020: 1580-1589.

[14] Ioffe S, Szegedy C. Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 2015, 37: 448-456.

[15] Liu Z, Li J, Shen Z, et al. Learning Efficient Convolutional Networks through Network Slimming. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017: 2736-2744.

[16] Li H, Kadav A, Durdanovic I, et al. Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNets. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.

[17] Allen J B, Rabiner L R. A Unified Approach to Short-Time Fourier Analysis and Synthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1977, 65(11): 1558-1564.

[18] Everingham M, Van Gool L, Williams C K I, et al. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes (VOC) Challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2010, 88(2): 303-338.

[19] Li W Z. Analysis of Object Detection Performance Based on Faster R-CNN. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1827(1): 012085.

[20] Ren S, He K, Girshick R, et al. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015, 28: 91-99.

[21] Liang J, Liu G D. An Approach on Image Processing of Deep Learning Based on Improved SSD. Symmetry, 2021, 13: 495.

[22] Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, et al. SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. Computer Vision – ECCV 2016, 2016: 21-37.

[23] Reddy B, Reddy A, Mounika T, et al. A Comparative Study on Object Detection Using Retinanet. 2022 IEEE 2nd Mysore Sub Section International Conference (MysuruCon), 2022: 1-6.

[24] Lin T Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, et al. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2017: 2980-2988.

[25] Ferdi A. Lightweight G-YOLOv11: Advancing Efficient Fracture Detection in Pediatric Wrist X-rays. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.00647, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-11

How to Cite

Peng Zhang, LiangHai Sun. A FAST PULSE SIGNAL DETECTION METHOD BASED ON THE MG-YOLOv11n NETWORK. Journal of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering. 2026, 8(7): 74-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/jcsee3166.