THEORETICAL DEMANDS AND CONSTRUCTIVE PATHS FOR BUILDING AN AUTONOMOUS KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM OF CHINESE BORDERLAND STUDIES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE HOLISTIC VIEW OF NATIONAL SECURITY
Keywords:
Chinese Borderland Studies, Autonomous knowledge system, Holistic View of National Security, Western security theory, Borderland securityAbstract
Based on the theoretical demands of China’s borderland governance, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of Western security theories—namely, geopolitics, regional reshaping, human security, and securitization—and demonstrates that these theories exhibit structural biases when applied to explaining issues concerning China’s borderlands. Western theories either position borderlands as bargaining chips in great-power balancing, or sever the historical integrity of borderlands through academic discourse, or carry out intervention under the guise of individual security, or stigmatize normal governance through discursive manipulation. Grounded in Western historical experience and interest-based appeals, these theories cannot account for the historical realities of interaction, exchange, and integration in China’s borderlands, nor can they explain the development logic of enriching the people and revitalizing the borderland and of stabilizing and consolidating the borderland. In response, this paper, guided by the Holistic View of National Security, proposes four localized concepts—the “Harmonious Borderland” geopolitical outlook, the “Historical Integrity” borderland regional perspective, the “People’s Security” borderland security outlook, and the “Development and Security” borderland governance outlook—to construct an autonomous knowledge system for China’s borderland security and provide reference for deepening the theoretical development of Chinese Borderland Studies.References
[1] Li D. On building an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese borderland studies. Ideological Front, 2025(5): 77-78.
[2] Fan E. Accelerating the construction of an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese borderland studies. Qiushi, December 15, 2025. https://www.qstheory.cn/20251215/65258d199ddd49198785921961aa2594/c.html.
[3] Yu K. The subjectivity value, connotation, and practical path of building an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese borderland studies. Western Mongolian Forum, 2026(2): 3.
[4] Xi J P. Stresses in-depth implementation of various borderland governance tasks and promotion of high-quality development in borderland areas at the 18th collective study session of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee. People’s Daily, December 11, 2024.
[5] Li G Q. Reflections on building an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese borderland studies. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2023(1): 20-21.
[6] Zhu J. The era demands and target orientation for building an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese borderland studies. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2023(4): 17-18.
[7] Luo Q, Hu P F. Preliminary discussion on building an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese borderland studies and the construction of the ‘three systems’ of borderland studies. China’s Borderland History and Geography Studies, 2025(2): 1-2.
[8] Spykman N J. The Geography of the Peace. trans. Liu Y Z. Beijing: Commercial Press, 1965.
[9] Spykman N J. America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1942.
[10] International observation: Japan-U.S. ‘Keen Edge’ joint military exercise harms regional peace. People’s Daily Online, October 17, 2026. https://world.people.com.cn/n1/2026/1017/c1002-40816510.html.
[11] Philippines-U.S. ‘Balikatan’ military exercise sets new record in scale, obvious intention to stir up military confrontation. The Paper, April 25, 2026. https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33041614.
[12] "U.S.-India Yudh Abhyas-2026 Joint Military Exercise! 1,200 Personnel Participate, Less Than 50 Kilometers from the China-India Border," Toutiao, September 26, 2026, https://www.toutiao.com/article/7689734733202194978/?wid=1793330212031.
[13] Scott J C. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. trans. Wang X Y. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2016.
[14] Duan J S, Yin J D. Where did China’s ‘Zomia’ come from? A review of The Art of Not Being Governed. Historical Review, 2022(5): 74-78.
[15] Qi G. Toward political security: transcending ‘human security’ and reinterpreting security. Exploration, 2015(4): 107.
[16] Jiang Y. Human security and national security: a series of reflections on the philosophy of national security. State-Owned Assets Management, 2020(6): 71-80.
[17] Standing Committee of the People’s Congress of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Resolution on resolutely opposing the U.S. Xinjiang-related sanctions series of laws and supporting the development of sanctioned enterprises and related industries, September 2, 2024. https://www.xjpcsc.gov.cn/article/53e6c02b590d49ddbfb4ca22f3500ced.
[18] [18 ]Li J, Cui S J. On how borderland security becomes a positive value: an analysis based on the ‘securitization/desecuritization’ framework. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2012(1): 71.
[19] Wei Z J, Lu Y L. Critique and reflection on securitization theory. Chinese Social Sciences Net, October 12, 2023. https://www.cssn.cn/skgz/bwyc/202310/t20231012_5689994.shtml.
[20] Shang F, Liu R N. The path and motivation of the securitization of Mekong River water resources issues: taking Vietnam as an example. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2021(4): 56.
[21] Wang Q Z. The formation and impact of the ‘securitization’ of Greater Mekong water resources. Journal of Jiangnan Social University, 2016(4): 20.
[22] Li Y Q. The theoretical origins and characteristics of the tribute system. China’s Borderland History and Geography Studies, 2006(3): 37-42.
[23] Fei X T. The pluralistic integration pattern of the Chinese nation. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 1989(4): 3-21.
[24] Li J Q, Liu Q Q. Borderland security is the primary task and important guarantee of borderland governance: an interview with Professor Li Junqing, Executive Dean of the Institute of National Security Studies, Minzu University of China. Social Scientist, 2025(5): 3-8.
[25] Liu Y L. The logic and direction of the holistic view of national security empowering global security governance. Journal of Jishou University (Social Sciences), 2024, 45(6): 9-18.
[26] The first meeting of the Central National Security Commission convened, Xi Jinping: adhere to the holistic view of national security, April 16, 2014. https://epaper.cs.com.cn/zgzqb/images/2014-04/16/A04/ZQBA0020416C.pdf.
[27] National Security Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 3, July 1, 2015.
[28] Xi Jinping inspects Yunnan. China Today, March 2025. https://www.chinatoday.com.cn/zw2018/twxw/202503/t20250321_800396097.html.
[29] National Security Law of the People’s Republic of China, Articles 1, 2, and 16, July 1, 2015.
[30] Wei Z J, Lu Y L. ‘Paranoia’ and ‘avoidance’: research on the formation of the securitization dilemma. International Security Studies, 2022(1): 27.
[31] National Security Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 8, July 1, 2015.