MECHANISM AND PATH OF CHAIN MASTER ENTERPRISES LEADING THE COLLABORATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF ZHAOQING NEW ENERGY VEHICLE INDUSTRY CHAIN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF HETEROGENEITY

Authors

  • YingLin Li School of Management, Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China.
  • JiaXin Luo (Corresponding Author) School of Management, Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China.
  • LianHua Liu School of Management, Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China.
  • ZiLing Wang School of Management, Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China.

Keywords:

Anchor enterprises, Heterogeneity perspective, Industrial chain collaboration, New energy vehicles

Abstract

Against the backdrop of intensifying competition within industrial chains, the industrial organizational capabilities of anchor enterprises have become pivotal in shaping regional industrial networks. Anchor enterprises positioned at different nodes of the value chain exhibit markedly distinct industrial driving logics. This study selects XPeng Motors' Zhaoqing production base and Ruiqing Times as comparative cases to analyze, from a heterogeneity perspective, the differentiated industrial driving logics—and their respective regional synergistic effects—of vehicle manufacturing anchor enterprises versus core-component anchor enterprises. The research finds that vehicle manufacturing anchor enterprises establish a "demand–order-driven" mechanism, leveraging vehicle production, market orders, and supplier networks to generate supporting demand upstream in the industrial chain; whereas core-component anchor enterprises establish a "technology–product-driven" mechanism, relying on core power battery technologies and scalable production capacities to catalyze industrial agglomeration across the battery supply chain. The mere establishment and clustering of anchor enterprises does not automatically yield industrial chain synergy; instead, the regional industrial environment, industrial park infrastructure, and industrial support services constitute critical supporting conditions for the regionalization of the anchor enterprise effect, thereby influencing the transformation of enterprise-level industrial driving effects into regional industrial organizational capabilities. Within a dual-chain parallel configuration, challenges such as insufficient capabilities among supporting enterprises, weak cross-chain linkages, limited shared services, and the absence of collaborative mechanisms constrain the upgrading of industrial networks. Accordingly, this study proposes actionable pathways—including enhancing the capabilities of anchor enterprises, fostering the competencies of supporting entities, constructing cross-chain network architectures, and refining collaborative mechanisms-to guide regional industrial networks from a dual-chain parallel state toward dual-chain coupling.

References

[1] Cai Y H, Zhang X D, Ou Z H. The research status and progress of leading the development of industrial chain by chain owners. Research Management, 2025, 46(11): 12-22.

[2] Fan H J, Zheng Z, Wu T, et al. How can the innovation of "chain owner" enterprises drive the innovation of on chain enterprises? Economic Dynamics, 2025(10): 18-36.

[3] Wang J F, Li T T, Zhang Y Y. Research on the Path of Enhancing Industrial Chain Resilience through Ecological Leadership of Chain Owners: Taking BYD and China's New Energy Vehicle Industry Chain as Examples. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2024, 41(21): 151-160.

[4] Wang Y Y, Yuan C H, Song Q. Research on the Impact of Integrated Innovation Governance on the Key Core Technology Innovation Capability of Chain Master Enterprises. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures, 2026, 43(13): 102-114.

[5] Ji Y D, Zhao M, Zhao W. Evaluation of Ecological Leadership of Industrial Chain Master Enterprises Based on Grounded Theory: A Scale Development. Technological Progress and Countermeasures, 2024, 41(6): 86-96.

[6] Tang Y H, Li J L. Chain length system promotes high-quality development of industrial chain: theoretical mechanism and practical challenges. Contemporary Economic Management, 2025, 47(11): 60-67.

[7] Liu Z B. Micro mechanisms and policies for empowering the development of new quality productive forces through the management of the industrial chain. Guangdong Social Sciences, 2025(3): 19-28.

[8] Qu Y Y, Liao J C. The "Chain Owner" of the Industrial Chain: Policy Practice, Operational Logic, and Research on Realistic Difficulties. Industrial Economic Review, 2025(6).

[9] Liu H H, Lu Y, Lin Q Q, et al. Research on the Collaborative Development Path of New Energy Vehicle Industry Chain and Innovation Chain under the "Dual Carbon" Goal: A Case Study of Zhaoqing City. Contemporary Economy, 2023, 40(12): 66-74.

[10] Zhang Y F, Xie J G. Research on the Impact of Cultivating "Chain Owners" in the Industrial Chain on the Breakthrough of Core Technologies in Local Enterprises. Economic Science, 2026, 48(2): 13-35.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-12

Issue

Section

Research Article

DOI:

How to Cite

YingLin Li, JiaXin Luo, LianHua Liu, ZiLing Wang. Mechanism And Path Of Chain Master Enterprises Leading The Collaborative Development Of Zhaoqing New Energy Vehicle Industry Chain From The Perspective Of Heterogeneity. Journal of Trends in Finance and Economics. 2026, 3(4): 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/jtfe3083.