OPPORTUNITIES, CHALLENGES, AND RESPONSE PATHWAYS FOR URBAN MANAGEMENT IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Urban management, Intelligent governance, Algorithmic riskAbstract
Artificial intelligence is profoundly reshaping the paradigm of urban governance. On one hand, AI brings efficiency gains, resource optimization, and enhanced resilience — automated administration, precise services, and intelligent operations make cities run more efficiently. On the other hand, the accompanying risks cannot be ignored: algorithm optimization, responsible data governance, transparent decision-making, and inclusive digital development. These challenges highlight the importance of balancing technological innovation with public values. To overcome this predicament, a shift toward a people-centered governance paradigm is needed, where human-AI collaboration and inclusive governance establish a dynamic balance between efficiency and equity, innovation and regulation.References
[1] Zhang X H. ChatGPT-like AI technology embedded in digital government governance: Value, risks, and prevention and control. E-Government, 2023(04): 45-56.
[2] Zhao J W, He A X. Digital government governance theory and model innovation under the "intelligentization tournament": An analysis based on the "DeepSeek + government affairs" practice. E-Government, 2025(06): 16-30.
[3] Dong C Q, Li D Y, Mi J N. Large model embedding in government services: Capability boundaries, collaborative governance, and development pathways: Based on observations of large-scale local government deployment of DeepSeek. E-Government, 2025(08): 13-21.
[4] Zhang S Z, Ma Y Y, Liu H. DeepSeek empowering government services: Scenario reconstruction, operational logic, and advancement pathways. Modern Urban Research, 2025(07): 50-56.
[5] Yigitcanlar T, Desouza K, Mossberger K, et al. Artificial intelligence and the city: An editorial perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 2025, 32(1): 1-12.
[6] Yigitcanlar T, Senadheera S, Marasinghe Pelige R, et al. Artificial intelligence and the local government: A five-decade scientometric analysis. Cities, 2024, 150: 105017.
[7] Wolniak R, Stecuła K. Artificial intelligence in smart cities—Applications, barriers, and future directions: A review. Smart Cities, 2024, 7(3): 1346-1389.
[8] Wei Y S. Advantages, dilemmas, and response strategies of government governance algorithmization in the intelligent age. Public Administration and Policy Review, 2024, 13(04): 24-38.
[9] Peng Y P. The birth of perceptual politics: Technology governance in the era of human-machine collective intelligence. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 2025, 62(06): 87-95, 163.
[10] He N, Yao C L. AI large models empowering urban digital governance: Internal logic, practical challenges, and implementation pathways. Dongyue Tribune, 2025, 46(05): 184-190.
[11] Zhang C Y, Cai Q M, Yang L. Smart city construction and residents' happiness: An empirical analysis based on CLDS data. Social Sciences, 2023(01): 128-140.
[12] Huang X H, Wang L C. Algorithmic governance in public administration: Rise, risks, and regulation. Journal of Beijing Administrative College, 2025(01): 64-72.
[13] Zang L Z, Chen H. Generative AI algorithmic risks and social governance challenges. Journal of the Party School of the Central Committee of the C.P.C. (Chinese Academy of Governance), 2025, 29(01): 43-53.
[14] Alon-Barkat S, Busuioc M, Schwoerer K, et al. Algorithmic governance in public service provision: Understanding citizens’ attribution of responsibility for human versus algorithmic decision-making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2025, 35(3): 273-289.
[15] Kuang Y L, Meng C Y. The construction of a digitally inclusive aging society from a global perspective: Evolution, issue focus, and pathway exploration. E-Government, 2025(06).
[16] Duan Z Z. Controlling algorithm-enabled governance: Dilemmas and pathways. E-Government, 2021(12): 2-16.
[17] Zhang Z, Guan Z X. Legal regulation of digital governance in mega-cities. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 2025, 31(04): 251-264.
[18] Lü P. Core concepts and practical pathways of intelligent social governance. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2025, 64(05): 177-188.
[19] Yang J, Liu J N. The realization of people-centeredness: Research on human-AI collaborative pathways and public decision-making models in urban social governance. Academic Research, 2025(06): 67-75, 99.
[20] Liu W, Zhao X F. A new approach to generative governance for complex social fields: Exploring governance methods based on generative AI. Journal of Public Administration, 2025, 22(01): 102-114.
[21] Yang L, Meng S F, Li Y. "Power-algorithm" adaptive survival: The human-AI co-governance mechanism in smart governance of urban villages in mega-cities: A case study of T Village in Tianjin. E-Government, 2025.
[22] Keppeler F, Borchert J, Pedersen M J, et al. How ensembling AI and public managers improves decision-making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2025, 35(3): 289-307.
[23] Tan X Y. Generative AI large models embedded in social governance: Empowering scenarios, risk patterns, and regulatory pathways. Jinan Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2024, 46(12): 97-111.
[24] Wang L Z, Xu C M. Cross-departmental collaboration: Operational mechanisms and practical pathways of smart city governance in China. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 2024(06): 146-156.
[25] Wu P Y, Shen H M, Liang Z. Agile governance of government large models: A multi-case analysis based on "data-scenarios". E-Government, 2025(08): 2-12.
[26] Lee J W, Lee K. Building a consensus: Harmonizing AI ethical guidelines and legal frameworks in Korea for enhanced governance. Government Information Quarterly, 2025, 42(3): 102060.
[27] Bian X, Wang B, Yang A. The trust trifecta: How transparency, ethics, and benefits shape public confidence in government AI. Government Information Quarterly, 2025, 42(4): 102083.
[28] Almeida P G R, Santos Júnior C D. Artificial intelligence governance: Understanding how public organizations implement it. Government Information Quarterly, 2025, 42(1): 102003.
[29] David A, Yigitcanlar T, Desouza K, et al. Understanding local government responsible AI strategy: An international municipal policy analysis. Cities, 2024, 154: 105097.