A CORPUS-BASED DIACHRONIC STUDY OF EPICENE PRONOUNS IN ENGLISH: A CASE OF ANAPHORA TO COMPOUND INDEFINITE PRONOUNS

Authors

  • Qiong Hu (Corresponding Author) National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, Hunan, China.

Keywords:

Language variation and change, English personal pronouns, Gender category, Epicene pronouns

Abstract

From old English to modern English, the gender category has shifted from a grammatical system to a natural one, with only pronouns retaining gender marking. He and they used as epicene pronouns represent a common phenomenon of gender disagreement. This study examines epicene pronoun usage with anaphors restricted to possessives (his, their) and antecedents to compound indefinite pronouns (someone, somebody), considering writing form, prefix and suffix semantics, and frequency. Results show that their is increasingly used as the epicene pronoun while his declines, a trend influenced by social factors as well as the semantics and frequency of antecedents. The use of plural their in anaphoric reference to singular indefinite pronouns can be viewed as number variation, and its replacement of his as a change in both gender and number category. Among candidates for the gender-neutral function, their proves the most promising based on diachronic evidence.

References

[1] Curzan A. Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

[2] Corbett G G. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

[3] Siewierska A. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

[4] Wales K. Personal pronouns in present-day English. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[5] Huddleston R D, Pullum G K. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

[6] Newman M. A theoretical and descriptive study of epicene pronouns: The linguistics of a prescriptive problem. Columbia: Columbia University, 1993.

[7] Stojanovska-Ilievska N. A corpus-based study of epicene pronouns used by Macedonian learners of English. Open Linguistics, 2024, 10(1): 281-308.

[8] Yakut I, Genç B, Bada E. Epicene pronoun usage in the social sciences: The case of research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2021, 52: 101005.

[9] Balhorn M. The Epicene Pronoun in Contemporary Newspaper Prose. American Speech, 2009, 84(4): 391-413.

[10] Baranowski M. Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2002, 6(3): 378-397.

[11] Laitinen M. HE and THEY in indefinite anaphora in written present-day English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 2003, 7(2): 137-164.

[12] Stotko E M, Troyer M. A New Gender-neutral Pronoun in Baltimore, Maryland: A Preliminary Study. American Speech, 2007, 82(3): 262-279.

[13] Laitinen M. Indefinite Pronominal Anaphora in English Correspondence between 1500 and 1800. 2004.

[14] Paterson L L. Epicene pronouns in UK national newspapers: A diachronic study. ICAME Journal, 2011, 35: 171-184.

[15] Noll J, Lowry M, Bryant J. Changes Over Time in the Comprehension of He and They as Epicene Pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2018, 47(5): 1057-1068.

[16] Ma Z, Wu S, Xu S. Acceptance and Online Interpretation of “Gender-Neutral Pronouns”: Performance Asymmetry by Chinese English as a Foreign Language Learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 12.

[17] Davies M. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). 2010. https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/.

[18] Haspelmath M. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

[19] Kehler A, Rohde H. Prominence and coherence in a Bayesian theory of pronoun interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 2018: 23-2018.

[20] Mackay D G, Fulkerson D C. On the Comprehension and Production of Pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1979, 18(6): 661-673.

[21] Corbett G G. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

[22] Quirk R, Greenbaum S, Leech G, et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman, 1985.

[23] Laitinen M. Sociolinguistic patterns in grammaticalization: He, they, and those in human indefinite reference. Language Variation and Change, 2008, 20(1): 155-185.

[24] Baugh A C, Cable T. A History of the English Language. 5th ed. London: Routledge, 2002.

[25] Ibrahim M H. Grammatical Gender: Its Origin and Development. The Hague: Mouton, 1973.

[26] Baron D E. Grammar and Gender. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1986.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Qiong Hu. A Corpus-Based Diachronic Study Of Epicene Pronouns In English: A Case Of Anaphora To Compound Indefinite Pronouns. Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities Research. 2026, 4(7): 13-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/tsshr3260.