ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENABLED REGTECH FOR KYC, FINANCIAL COMPLIANCE, AND REGULATORY REPORTING: APPLICATIONS, RISKS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Keywords:
Regulatory technology, Know your customer, Financial compliance, Regulatory reporting, Artificial intelligenceAbstract
Financial institutions face growing volumes of customer, payment, ownership, and regulatory data while remaining accountable for risk-based compliance decisions. Artificial intelligence-enabled regulatory technology can assist this work by combining digital identity services, entity resolution, rules, machine learning, graph analytics, natural language processing, and workflow automation. This narrative review explains the technical architecture of such systems and examines their use in know-your-customer procedures, financial compliance monitoring, investigations, and regulatory reporting. The technology can improve data reconciliation, prioritise alerts, reveal relationships that are difficult to detect in isolated records, retrieve evidence, and automate repeatable reporting steps. Its value, however, is constrained by incomplete labels, severe class imbalance, concept drift, adversarial adaptation, opaque models, privacy risks, fragmented rules, legacy systems, and dependence on external vendors. A lower false-positive rate does not by itself demonstrate improved monitoring effectiveness, and a suspicious transaction or activity report should be understood as an indicator for further review rather than definitive evidence of non-compliance. Responsible implementation therefore requires a layered architecture in which traceable controls preserve explicit regulatory requirements, models are validated against operational objectives, consequential decisions receive documented human oversight, and every data transformation, model version, explanation, override, and report remains auditable. Future development is likely to centre on privacy-preserving collaboration, temporal graph models, machine-readable regulation, and source-grounded generative assistants. AI-enabled RegTech should be treated as governed decision support, not as an autonomous substitute for legal interpretation, customer due diligence, investigation, or regulatory accountability.References
[1] Arner D W, Barberis J, Buckley R P. FinTech, RegTech, and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 2017, 37(3): 371-414. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol37/iss3/2/.
[2] Financial Stability Board. The Use of Supervisory and Regulatory Technology by Authorities and Regulated Institutions: Market Developments and Financial Stability Implications. Basel: Financial Stability Board, 2020. https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P091020.pdf.
[3] Grassi L, Lanfranchi D. RegTech in public and private sectors: The nexus between data, technology and regulation. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 2022, 49(3): 441-479. DOI: 10.1007/s40812-022-00226-0.
[4] Financial Action Task Force. Opportunities and Challenges of New Technologies for AML/CFT. Paris: Financial Action Task Force, 2021. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/Opportunities-Challenges-of-New-Technologies-for-AML-CFT.pdf.coredownload.pdf.
[5] Financial Action Task Force. Guidance on Digital Identity. Paris: Financial Action Task Force, 2020. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/Guidance-on-Digital-Identity.pdf.coredownload.pdf.
[6] Johannessen F, Jullum M. Finding money launderers using heterogeneous graph neural networks. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 2025, 11: 100175. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfds.2025.100175.
[7] Butler T, O'Brien L. Understanding RegTech for digital regulatory compliance. In: Lynn T, Mooney J G, Rosati P, et al., editors. Disrupting Finance: FinTech and Strategy in the 21st Century. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019: 85-102. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0_6.
[8] Financial Conduct Authority, Bank of England. Digital Regulatory Reporting: Pilot Phase 1 Report. London: Financial Conduct Authority and Bank of England, 2018. https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/discussion/digital-regulatory-reporting-pilot-phase-1-report.pdf.
[9] European Banking Authority. EBA Analysis of RegTech in the EU Financial Sector. EBA/REP/2021/17. Paris: European Banking Authority, 2021. https://www.eba.europa.eu/publications-and-media/press-releases/eba-assesses-benefits-challenges-and-risks-regtech-use-eu-and.
[10] Perez-Cruz F, Prenio J, Restoy F, et al. Managing explanations: how regulators can address AI explainability. FSI Occasional Papers No 24. Basel: Bank for International Settlements, 2025. https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsipapers24.htm.
[11] Financial Stability Board. The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial Intelligence. Basel: Financial Stability Board, 2024. https://www.fsb.org/2024/11/the-financial-stability-implications-of-artificial-intelligence/.
[12] Financial Action Task Force. Stocktake on Data Pooling, Collaborative Analytics and Data Protection. Paris: Financial Action Task Force, 2021. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/dam/fatf-gafi/guidance/Stocktake-Datapooling-Collaborative-Analytics.pdf.