CARBON COMPLIANCE AND EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS OF LITHIUM BATTERIES BASED ON SPATIOTEMPORAL ELECTRICITY-CARBON ACCOUNTING: A CASE STUDY OF EVE ENERGY’S JINGMEN BASE

Authors

  • MingYang Xi (Corresponding Author) International Business School, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China.

Keywords:

Electricity-carbon factor, Temporal and spatial resolution, Life-cycle carbon footprint, Lithium-ion battery, Export compliance, EVE Energy

Abstract

Against the backdrop of increasing regulatory attention to lifecycle emissions and product-level traceability, lithium-ion battery exporters need credible carbon footprint information. This study takes the Jingmen base of EVE Energy as a case to analyze how the temporal and spatial resolution of electricity carbon factors affects the visibility of green electricity benefits. The study comprehensively reviews the rooftop photovoltaic and energy storage investments, Hubei grid factors, and third-party verification records reported in the case. The case report shows that the rooftop photovoltaic installed capacity is 92.30 MW, with electricity generation of 104,602.54 MWh, and an estimated emission reduction of 59,654 t CO₂e; after recalculation using refined factors, the carbon emission intensity associated with electricity consumption for energy storage cell production changes from 5.5214 to 3.4477 kg CO₂e/kWh, and the accounting granularity is reported to have improved by 25%. The analysis distinguishes the visibility of carbon accounting from independently verified actual emission reductions, and summarizes the roles of hourly matching, localized grid factors, third-party verification, and digital product records. These measures help improve the auditability of electricity-related performance and enhance export compliance readiness, providing a reference for carbon management optimization for lithium battery exporters.

References

[1] Chen Q W, Lai X, Gu H H, et al. Investigating carbon footprint and carbon reduction potential using a cradle-to-cradle LCA approach on lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 369: 133342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133342.

[2] Sun X, Lian W, Gao T, et al. Spatial-temporal characteristics of carbon emission intensity in electricity generation and spatial spillover effects of driving factors across China’s provinces. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 405: 136908. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136908.

[3] Berger K, Baumgartner R J, Weinzerl M, et al. Data requirements and availabilities for a digital battery passport: A value chain actor perspective. Cleaner Production Letters, 2023, 4: 100032. DOI: 10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100032.

[4] Kallitsis E, Lindsay J J, Chordia M, et al. Think global act local: The dependency of global lithium-ion battery emissions on production location and material sources. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 449: 141725. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141725.

[5] Hansen S, Rüther T, Mennenga M, et al. A structured approach for the compliance analysis of battery systems with regard to the new EU Battery Regulation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2024, 209: 107752. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107752.

[6] Zhu G, Tian Y, Xiong J, et al. High-resolution data unveil overestimation of China’s electricity carbon footprint in international LCA databases. The Innovation Energy, 2026, 3: 100132. DOI: 10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2026.100132.

[7] European Parliament, Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries. 2023. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj.

[8] European Commission. Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Sectors. [2026-09-30]. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism/cbam-sectors_en.

[9] Ministry of Ecology and Environment, National Bureau of Statistics, National Energy Administration. Announcement on the release of 2024 electricity carbon-footprint factor data. (2025-10-24)[2026-09-19]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202510/W020251024569470952545.pdf.

[10] Gao H B, Yan K, Zhao L H, et al. Localized product carbon-footprint accounting in China: A case study of the lithium-battery industry. Strategic Study of CAE, 2025, 27(5): 103-116.

[11] Lu X B, Zhao L, Yang Y, et al. Calculation of temporal and regional electricity-carbon factors and their application in product carbon-footprint accounting. Strategic Study of CAE, 2025, 27(5): 93-102.

[12] Li Y W, Zhang S X, Yang C, et al. Real-time electricity-carbon accounting considering green-electricity and green-certificate trading. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2025, 45(12): 4543-4555.

[13] Huizhou EVE Energy Co., Ltd. EVE Energy 2024 Sustainability Report. Huizhou: EVE Energy, 2025[2026-09-20].

[14] EVE Energy. EVE Energy receives the first global TÜV SÜD Mark certification under Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. (2024-12-20)[2026-09-19]. https://www.evebattery.com/news-919.

[15] Zhu K, Liu B. State Grid Hubei Power develops a precise electricity-carbon metric. State Grid News, 2026-04-27[2026-09-21]. https://epaper.sgcctop.com/202604/27/con-766881.html.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-02

How to Cite

MingYang Xi. Carbon Compliance And Export Competitiveness Of Lithium Batteries Based On Spatiotemporal Electricity-Carbon Accounting: A Case Study Of Eve Energy’s Jingmen Base. World Journal of Economics and Business Research. 2026, 4(7): 32-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjebr3134.