A TRAJECTORY PLANNING METHOD FOR FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT IN STATIC NO-FLY ZONE ENVIRONMENTS
Keywords:
Fixed-wing aircraft, Trajectory planning, Weighted kinematic A*, Dubins curve, No-fly zoneAbstract
To address the difficulty of simultaneously satisfying heading continuity, minimum turning-radius constraints, and safe obstacle avoidance in trajectory planning for fixed-wing aircraft operating in static no-fly zone (NFZ) environments, a horizontal trajectory planning model is formulated by incorporating position, heading, curvature constraints, and safety margins around NFZs. A planning method combining weighted kinematic A* with Dubins terminal connection is then proposed. The method jointly represents planar position and heading angle as the search state and expands nodes using constant-curvature motion primitives that satisfy the prescribed curvature constraints. A weighted Dubins distance is employed to guide the search toward the target, while a Dubins curve is used within the target neighborhood to connect the current state to the desired terminal state. Simulation results demonstrate that, in scenarios involving multiple circular NFZs, the proposed method can generate continuous collision-free trajectories that satisfy the prescribed initial and terminal headings, safety-clearance requirements, and minimum turning-radius constraints. The resulting trajectory length increases only moderately relative to the straight-line distance, while the explored nodes are primarily concentrated near feasible passages. These results validate the effectiveness of the proposed method for trajectory planning of fixed-wing aircraft in static NFZ environments.References
[1] Aggarwal S, Kumar N. Path planning techniques for unmanned aerial vehicles: A review, solutions, and challenges. Computer Communications, 2020, 149: 270-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.014.
[2] Ait Saadi A, Soukane A, Meraihi Y, et al. UAV path planning using optimization approaches: A survey. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29(6): 4233-4284. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-022-09742-7.
[3] Ul Husnain A, Mokhtar N, Mohamed Shah N, et al. A systematic literature review on autonomous path planning of unmanned aerial vehicles. Drones, 2023, 7(2): 118. DOI: 10.3390/drones7020118.
[4] Gugan G, Haque A. Path planning for autonomous drones: Challenges and future directions. Drones, 2023, 7(3): 169. DOI: 10.3390/drones7030169.
[5] Debnath D, Vanegas F, Sandino J, et al. A review of UAV path-planning algorithms and obstacle avoidance methods for remote sensing applications. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(21): 4019. DOI: 10.3390/rs16214019.
[6] Jiang Y, Xu X X, Zheng M Y, et al. Evolutionary computation for unmanned aerial vehicle path planning: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2024, 57: 267. DOI: 10.1007/s10462-024-10913-0.
[7] Gao H, Jia Y, Qin Q, et al. Integrating just-in-time expansion primitives and an adaptive variable-step-size mechanism for feasible path planning of fixed-wing UAVs. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2025, 38(12): 103566. DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2025.103566.
[8] Du H, You M, Zhao X. Globally guided deep V-network-based motion planning algorithm for fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles. Sensors, 2024, 24(12): 3984. DOI: 10.3390/s24123984.
[9] Huang H, Shang Y, Liu X, et al. An improved Bi-RRT*-based path planning algorithm with adaptive search strategy assignment mechanism for ultra-low-altitude penetration of fixed-wing aircraft. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024, 152: 109363. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2024.109363.
[10] Wang Y, Wang H, Liu Y H, et al. 6-DOF UAV path planning and tracking control for obstacle avoidance: A deep learning-based integrated approach. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024, 151: 109320. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2024.109320.
[11] Chai X, Zheng Z, Xiao J, et al. Multi-strategy fusion differential evolution algorithm for UAV path planning in complex environment. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 121: 107287. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.107287.
[12] Fan J, Chen X, Liang X. UAV trajectory planning based on bi-directional APF-RRT* algorithm with goal-biased. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 213: 119137. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119137.
[13] Zhou X, Tang Z, Wang N, et al. A novel state transition algorithm with adaptive fuzzy penalty for multi-constraint UAV path planning. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 248: 123481. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123481.
[14] Jiang S, Wang J, Li C, et al. Identification of no-fly zones for delivery drone path planning in various urban wind environments. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(8): 085166. DOI: 10.1063/5.0221281.