PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF THE STATIONARY DISTRIBUTION OF MARKOV CHAINS IN TEACHING-EFFECT EVALUATION

Authors

  • Jun Fu (Corresponding Author) School of Financial Management, Chengdu Ginkgo Hotel Management College, Chengdu 611743, Sichuan, China.

Keywords:

Markov chain, Stationary distribution, Grade transition, Learning analytics, Teaching evaluation

Abstract

To explore the application of Markov-chain models in process-oriented teaching evaluation, this study analyzes grade transitions among students in two Advanced Mathematics classes. A total of 80 students were included, and their scores from two stage assessments were classified into five levels: excellent, good, medium, pass, and fail. Based on the paired assessment records, transition-frequency tables and transition-probability matrices were constructed for the two classes. The short-term grade distributions and stationary distributions were subsequently calculated to examine the dynamic characteristics and potential evolution of students’ learning states. The results show that the two classes exhibited different grade-transition patterns. Class A demonstrated a relatively concentrated and stable transition structure, with most students tending toward the good and medium levels and a comparatively low proportion remaining at the failing level. Class B maintained a relatively prominent excellent group, but its lower-performing students showed greater dispersion and a stronger tendency to remain in or move toward the lower grade levels. The Markov-chain model integrates individual grade transitions with class-level score distributions, enabling a quantitative and visual description of changes in students’ learning states. This approach provides a methodological reference for stage-based learning assessment, differentiated instructional intervention, and data-informed optimization of Advanced Mathematics teaching.

References

[1] Lemay D J, Baek C, Doleck T. Comparison of learning analytics and educational data mining: A topic modeling approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 2: 100016.

[2] Caspari-Sadeghi S. Learning assessment in the age of big data: Learning analytics in higher education. Cogent Education, 2023, 10(1): 2162697.

[3] Linden K, van der Ploeg N, Roman N. Explainable learning analytics to identify disengaged students early in semester: An intervention supporting widening participation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2023, 45(6): 626-640.

[4] Zheng L Q, Fan Y C, Gao L, et al. The impact of learning analytics interventions on learning achievements: A meta-analysis of research from 2012 to 2021. Interactive Learning Environments, 2024, 32(10): 6267-6282.

[5] Channa F, Dindar M, Nguyen A, et al. Exploring sequential interplay between challenges and regulatory processes in collaborative learning with process mining. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2024, 68(6): 1320-1342.

[6] Shou Z Y, Xie M Q, Mo J W, et al. Predicting student performance in online learning: A multidimensional time-series data analysis approach. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(6): 2522.

[7] Nezami N, Haghighat P, Gandara D, et al. Assessing disparities in predictive modeling outcomes for college student success: The impact of imputation techniques on model performance and fairness. Education Sciences, 2024, 14(2): 136.

[8] Manly C A. Connecting prescriptive analytics with student success: Evaluating institutional promise and planning. Education Sciences, 2024, 14(4): 413.

[9] Mai J H, Wei F X, He W, et al. An explainable student performance prediction method based on dual-level progressive classification belief rule base. Electronics, 2024, 13(22): 4358.

[10] Tang B, Li S L, Zhao C H. Predicting the performance of students using deep ensemble learning. Journal of Intelligence, 2024, 12(12): 124.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20

Issue

Section

Research Article

DOI:

How to Cite

Jun Fu. Practical Application Of The Stationary Distribution Of Markov Chains In Teaching-Effect Evaluation. World Journal of Educational Studies. 2026, 4(9): 61-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3195.