AI-DRIVEN, EVIDENCE-BASED GENERATIVE DESIGN: A TEACHING FRAMEWORK FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTONICS INTEGRATING RESEARCH FINDINGS, DESIGN PRECEDENTS, AND INTELLIGENT RECOGNITION AND JUDGMENT
Keywords:
AI-driven generative design, Landscape architectonics, Evidence-based design, Curriculum reform, Evidence constraintAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has entered design courses, but its use often stops at tool operation. Taking Landscape Architectonics, an undergraduate course in landscape architecture programs, as the vehicle, this paper builds a teaching framework for generative design that integrates four elements: research findings, design precedents, AI-based recognition and judgment, and AI generation. The core claim is simple. Teaching students to “use AI” means teaching them to run an evidence-constrained generative design chain. “AI-driven” therefore carries two meanings: at the tool level, AI executes generation; at the teaching level, evidence steers generation, and the work of teaching lies in leading students from the former toward the latter. Among the four elements, research findings and design precedents are static knowledge that travels across sites. Research findings supply criteria for what counts as good. Design precedents supply examples of what to do, distilled from 13 street design guidelines into 114 retrievable situation packages. AI-based recognition and AI generation produce dynamic outputs anchored to a specific site. Students mobilize these elements through three stages—reading the site, grounding the context, and giving form—and a chain of evidence disciplines each stage. The framework follows three design principles: complementary elements, partial embedding, and explicit judgment. Three classroom examples show how the framework operates. This paper focuses on framework construction and does not report learning-outcome data.References
[1] Xiangyu Z, Guoqing L, Li S. Reconstruction of Digital Design Teaching and Paths of Ideological and Political Integration in Landscape Architecture Driven by AIGC. Journal of Landscape Research, 2026, 18(1/2): 54-59.
[2] Jin S, Tu H, Li J, et al. Enhancing architectural education through artificial intelligence: a case study of an AI-assisted architectural programming and design course. Buildings, 2024, 14(6): 1613.
[3] Chandrasekera T, Hosseini Z, Perera U. Can artificial intelligence support creativity in early design processes? International Journal of Architectural Computing, 2025, 23(1): 122-136.
[4] Yang X, Jiang D, Liu M. Construction and application of a landscape design teaching platform driven by artificial intelligence. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 2024, 19(1): 1-16.
[5] Shi S. Effectiveness of evidence-based design approaches for built environment professional education: A case study on an urban design studio. Buildings, 2024, 14(3): 836.
[6] Brown R D, Corry R C. Evidence-based landscape architecture: The maturing of a profession. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 100(4): 327-329.
[7] Nikolić O, Careva K, Vujović M. Evidence-based design in architectural education: Curriculum visibility, recognition and interest. Facta Universitatis, Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2026.
[8] Akin Ö. Case-based instruction strategies in architecture. Design Studies, 2002, 23(4): 407-431.
[9] Kolodner J L, Cox M T, González-Calero P A. Case-based reasoning-inspired approaches to education. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2005, 20(3): 299-303.
[10] Pilosof N P, Grobman Y J. Evidence-based design in architectural education: Designing the first Maggie’s Centre in Israel. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 2021, 14(4): 114-129.
[11] Hamilton D K. There is evidence to support design for health, but rarely proof. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 2018, 11(2): 189-191.
[12] Yao L, Zhang R, Wu J, et al. Heterogeneous dominant factors of heat resilience across diverse urban patterns. Land Use Policy, 2025, 157: 107676.
[13] Lin S, Zhengtang T. AI Literacy Scale for Undergraduate Design Students: Development and Validation. SAGE Open, 2026, 16(2): 21582440261463131.