DYNAMIC MODELING AND EFFICIENCY COMPARISON OF SPACE ELEVATORS AND CHEMICAL ROCKETS FOR EARTH-MOON CARGO TRANSPORTATION
Keywords:
Space elevator, Tsiolkovsky rocket equation, Coriolis effect, Transport dynamics, Lunar logisticsAbstract
To support the material delivery demand of large-scale lunar colonies, this paper establishes a unified physical dynamic model for space elevators and traditional chemical rockets. Different from existing separated single-carrier theoretical derivations, this study simultaneously incorporates radial force balance and transverse Coriolis oscillation loss into elevator energy calculation, quantitatively correcting the energy consumption increment caused by cable lateral swing, which fills the gap of simplified energy models ignoring lateral disturbance loss. For multi-stage rockets, the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation is improved by introducing system loss coefficient to quantify the extra energy consumed by nozzle loss and gravity loss. Comparative quantitative calculations show that the payload ratio of space elevators reaches 46.85%, which is 23.78 times higher than rockets, and the unit mass energy consumption is only 10.7% of chemical launch vehicles, though rockets possess slight advantages in single trip time. Numerical results further reveal that Coriolis disturbance accounts for 8%–12% of the elevator’s total energy cost, a critical factor neglected by most previous static models. The established dynamic model provides standardized energy and time evaluation indexes for multi-modal Earth-Moon logistics schemes, and lays a physical foundation for subsequent transportation capacity allocation optimization and life-cycle environmental impact assessment.References
[1] Denis A, Elizabeth G, Palacios J C, et al. An Analysis of the Requirements for a Sustainable Lunar Transportation System to Enable Initial DIANA Infrastructure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2023, 2526(1).
[2] Roscosmos notes low level of cooperation with NASA, would like to interact in Moon colonizing. Interfax: Russia & CIS Military Newswire, 2020.
[3] MLee H J, So S B, Chang B S. New concept for lunar construction: integration of Earth-based cement and lunar resources in the era of low-cost space transportation. Geosystem Engineering, 2026, 29(1): 73-83.
[4] Botezatu E U, Stanciu A, Ciupercă M E, et al. Transforming outer space transportation through immersive technologies: a SWOT analysis. Romanian Journal of Information Technology and Automatic Control, 2024, 34(3).
[5] Danescu N S, Crisan A A, Buzetelu S V, et al. Enabling High-Efficiency Cislunar Transportation: A Mission Architecture Study Based on Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Systems. Aerospace, 2026, 13(5): 451.
[6] Guo Qiang, Shi Zhi, Gao Ming. Cislunar Transportation Optimization Framework Based on Weighted Multi-Objective Optimization and Negative Binomial Reliability Modeling. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2026, 15(3): 70-76.
[7] Lee H J, So S B, Chang B S. New concept for lunar construction: integration of Earth-based cement and lunar resources in the era of low-cost space transportation. Geosystem Engineering, 2026, 29(1): 73-83.
[8] Dickinson S C, Alam D, Francis R, et al. A Method for Lunar Surface Autonomy Certification: Application to a Construction Pathfinder Mission. Aerospace, 2025, 12(12): 1115.
[9] Tokudome S, Maru Y, Nonaka S. Medium-to long-term strategies in the field of space transportation systems formulated by the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency under the Inter-University Research Institute System. Space Policy, 2024, 68: 101623.
[10] Nishida S, Tsuchikawa S, Matsui M. Earth–Mars Transportation via Hall Thrusters Using Carbon Dioxide. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Aerospace Technology Japan, 2024, 22(22): 71-77.