SLOPE DEFORMATION DATA CALIBRATION BASED ON LINEAR REGRESSION AND SEGMENTED IDENTIFICATION ALGORITHMS

Authors

  • GuiTao Li School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, China.
  • ShiJie Zhang (Corresponding Author) School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, China.

Keywords:

Linear regression, Sensor data calibration, Savitzky-Golay smoothing, Hampel detection, Segmented deformation identification

Abstract

This study develops an algorithmic framework for slope deformation monitoring data calibration and staged deformation identification. The selected modeling section focuses on correcting systematic deviation in fiber-optic displacement measurements and identifying transition nodes in surface displacement sequences. A univariate linear regression model is established between fiber-optic displacement data and vibrating-wire displacement reference data, and the calibration parameters are solved by minimizing the residual sum of squares. Five-fold cross-validation is used to evaluate stability, while MSE, RMSE, MAE, and R2 measure calibration accuracy. The full-sample fitting result reaches MSE = 7.195, RMSE = 2.682, MAE = 1.308, and R2 = 0.999, indicating that the calibrated displacement closely follows the reference sequence. For staged deformation identification, the method combines Savitzky-Golay smoothing, Hampel outlier detection, sliding Welch t-test screening, physical duration and monotonicity constraints, and segmented fitting. The final transition nodes are identified at indices 5261 and 8861, dividing the sequence into slow uniform deformation, accelerated deformation, and rapid deformation. The average velocities of the three stages are 0.1753, 0.6115, and 4.1211 mm/h, and the fitted R2 values are 0.947975, 0.983713, and 0.998814. The results show that the proposed framework can reduce sensor bias, identify deformation-stage evolution, and support monitoring-based warning analysis.

References

[1] Waskom M L. Seaborn: statistical data visualization. Journal of Open Source Software, 2021, 6(60): 3021.

[2] Montiel J, Halford M, Mastelini S M, et al. River: machine learning for streaming data in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2021, 22(110): 1-8.

[3] Herzen J, Lässig F, Piazzetta S G, et al. Darts: user-friendly modern machine learning for time series. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2022, 23(124): 1-6.

[4] Middlehurst M, Ismail-Fawaz A, Guillaume A, et al. aeon: a Python toolkit for learning from time series. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2024, 25(289): 1-10.

[5] Makridakis S, Spiliotis E, Assimakopoulos V. M5 accuracy competition: results, findings, and conclusions. International Journal of Forecasting, 2022, 38(4): 1346-1364.

[6] Makridakis S, Spiliotis E, Assimakopoulos V. The M5 uncertainty competition: results, findings and conclusions. International Journal of Forecasting, 2022, 38(4): 1365-1385.

[7] Torres J F, Hadjout D, Sebaa A, et al. Deep learning for time series forecasting: a survey. Big Data, 2021, 9(1): 3-21.

[8] Lim B, Zohren S. Time-series forecasting with deep learning: a survey. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 2021, 379(2194): 20200209.

[9] Januschowski T, Gasthaus J, Wang Y, et al. Forecasting with trees. International Journal of Forecasting, 2022, 38(4): 1473-1481.

[10] Hewamalage H, Bergmeir C, Bandara K. Recurrent neural networks for time series forecasting: current status and future directions. International Journal of Forecasting, 2021, 37(1): 388-427.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

Issue

Section

Research Article

DOI:

How to Cite

GuiTao Li, ShiJie Zhang. Slope Deformation Data Calibration Based On Linear Regression And Segmented Identification Algorithms. World Journal of Engineering Research. 2026, 4(6): 19-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjer3121.