GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN VOCATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING EDUCATION: APPLICATIONS, RISKS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Authors

  • BiJie Li (Corresponding Author) School of Finance and Economics, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, Hainan, China.
  • HaoXuan Li School of Finance and Economics, Hainan Vocational University of Science and Technology, Haikou 571126, Hainan, China.

Keywords:

Large language models, Accounting education, Finance education, Vocational undergraduate education, Authentic assessment

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence is entering finance and accounting classrooms before curricula, assessment systems, and institutional controls have fully adapted. This narrative review explains the technical principles of large language models and examines their use in vocational undergraduate finance and accounting education. Potential applications include dialogic tutoring, formative feedback, text simplification, case simulation, spreadsheet and programming support, financial analysis, professional communication, and course design. These functions can make practice more accessible and provide rapid opportunities for comparison and revision. Their educational value, however, depends on how the task is structured. Fluent output may contain fabricated facts, obsolete rules, incorrect calculations, biased assumptions, or unsupported recommendations. Unrestricted assistance may also improve immediate task performance without developing the independent knowledge and professional judgment that students need. Additional concerns include academic misconduct, confidential-data exposure, unequal access, unreliable detection, and weak accountability. A responsible integration model should therefore separate AI-free foundations, guided AI assistance, and AI-critical professional tasks. It should require authoritative-source verification, calculation checks, process records, disclosure, reflection, and oral or practical defense. Future systems may combine domain-controlled retrieval, multimodal simulations, and auditable learning records, but vocational programmes need direct longitudinal and multi-institutional evidence. Generative AI should be treated as a supervised learning partner and an object of professional evaluation, not as an authoritative answer engine.

References

[1] Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 2023, 103: 102274. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

[2] Ballantine J, Boyce G, Stoner G. A critical review of AI in accounting education: Threat and opportunity. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2024, 99: 102711. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102711.

[3] Córdova P, Grájeda A, Córdova J P, et al. Leveraging AI tools in finance education: Exploring student perceptions, emotional reactions and educator experiences. Cogent Education, 2024, 11(1): 2431885. DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2431885.

[4] Zhou A, Luo Y. Exploring the impact of generative AI on student learning in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 2025, 72: 100982. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100982.

[5] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Developing Vocational Education and Training with Artificial Intelligence. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2026. DOI: 10.1787/e9f76b4e-en.

[6] Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30: 5998-6008. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html.

[7] Ouyang L, Wu J, Jiang X, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022, 35: 27730-27744. DOI: 10.52202/068431-2011.

[8] Lewis P, Perez E, Piktus A, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020, 33: 9459-9474. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Abstract.html.

[9] Ji Z, Lee N, Frieske R, et al. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(12): 1-38. DOI: 10.1145/3571730.

[10] Bastani H, Bastani O, Sungu A, et al. Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2025, 122(26): e2422633122. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2422633122.

[11] Calderon T G, Gao L, Cardoso R L. Generative artificial intelligence in the classroom: A financial accounting experience. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, 2023, 27: 125-144. DOI: 10.1108/S1085-462220230000027006.

[12] Blondeel E, Bullock T, Gaskin J, et al. The effects of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) on learning in an accounting data analytics course. Journal of Accounting Education, 2025, 72: 100987. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2025.100987.

[13] Voshaar J, Wecks J O, Plate B J, et al. Tackling professorial expert bias: The role of ChatGPT in simplifying financial accounting exam texts. Issues in Accounting Education, 2025, 40(1): 93-123. DOI: 10.2308/ISSUES-2023-091.

[14] Cheng X, Dunn R, Holt T, et al. Artificial intelligence's capabilities, limitations, and impact on accounting education: Investigating ChatGPT's performance on educational accounting cases. Issues in Accounting Education, 2024, 39(2): 23-47. DOI: 10.2308/ISSUES-2023-032.

[15] Malladi R K. Emerging frontiers: Exploring the impact of generative AI platforms on university quantitative finance examinations. Journal of Financial Education, 2024, 50(2): 45-100. https://jfedweb.org/issues/JFEV5002.pdf.

[16] Miao F, Holmes W. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris: UNESCO, 2023. DOI: 10.54675/EWZM9535.

[17] Cotton D R E, Cotton P A, Shipway J R. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2024, 61(2): 228-239. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.

[18] Ng D T K, Leung J K L, Chu S K W, et al. Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2021, 2: 100041. DOI: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041.

[19] Tharapos M, Lau K H, Peszynski K, et al. Generative AI in accounting education: Evaluating ChatGPT's role in assessment and skill development. Accounting & Finance, 2025, 65(3): 3231-3244. DOI: 10.1111/acfi.70051.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-09

How to Cite

BiJie Li, HaoXuan Li. Generative Artificial Intelligence In Vocational Undergraduate Finance And Accounting Education: Applications, Risks, And Future Directions. World Journal of Educational Studies. 2026, 4(10): 20-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61784/wjes3203.